ACCC Proves Debt Settlement is a High-Quality Solution for Consumers
Our industry, debt settlement, has been scrutinized as a problematic industry. Commonly, consumers complain that a settlement company did nothing for them. The company charged excessive upfront fees, never spoke to their creditors, and as a result, the consumer eventually dropped out of the program after being sued by one or several creditors. How could we be sure that this portion of people was the rule and not the exception? Sometimes, negative press can alter the actual results because upset people are much more likely to voice their opinion, therefore skewing the actual or correct data.
A proper study of Debt Settlement Plans was recently conducted by Richard A. Briesch, PhD; an Associate Professor at Cox School of Business, for the ACCC (Americans for Consumer Credit Choice). In his report, “Economic Factors and the Debt Management Industry”, Briesch stated that Debt Settlement Plans (DSPs) had many positive attributes. When comparing Debt Settlement to other services in the Debt Management industry Dr. Briesch said “…the consumer welfare analysis suggests that DSPs create the greatest consumer welfare of any approach.” Consumer welfare typically refers to the benefits derived from the services provided. In other words, consumers got the most benefit from Debt Settlement programs vs. other programs in the Debt Management Industry.
For a copy of the report, go here.
